Business

Trump takes mail-ballot fight to Supreme Court

By Sohail Khan 4 September 2026, 7:27 am

Benchmarks
Nifty23,873.45-41.0

Precious Metal
Gold (MCX) (Rs/10g.)155,701.003299.0

Enter search text:

Business News›News›International›World News›Trump asks Supreme Court to allow tighter mail-ballot rules before midterms

Read Today's Paper

Trump asks Supreme Court to allow tighter mail-ballot rules before midterms
Synopsis

The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to enforce a new postal service rule. This regulation tightens standards for mail-in ballot delivery ahead of elections. A judge had previously blocked the rule, citing potential disruption to legitimate votes. The Justice Department seeks to lift the temporary injunction preventing enforcement. This action follows previous legal challenges to the directive on mail-in ballots.

U.S. President Trump meets with travel executives in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington — The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to enforce a new postal service rule. This regulation tightens standards for mail-in ballot delivery ahead of elections.

President Donald Trump's administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to let it enforce a new U.S. Postal Service rule tightening the use of mail-in ballots, moving swiftly after a judge temporarily blocked the regulation ahead of November's midterm elections.

In an emergency request, the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to lift Boston-based U.S. District ‌Judge Indira Talwani's order ⁠temporarily preventing ⁠the USPS from enforcing the new rule, which it adopted following an executive order by the Republican president to restrict mail-in ballots.

Also Read: Trump doubles down on sanctions, military pressure as Iran refuses to yield

The USPS regulation would impose new voter-specific data and ballot envelope standards, and potentially refuse the delivery of ballots that do not comply, which critics say could disrupt thousands of legitimate votes as the November 3 vote approaches.

Republicans are locked in a tight battle to retain control of Congress in the election. Critics say restricting mail-in ballots would stand to disproportionately benefit Republicans given that Democratic voters traditionally have been more likely to use mail-in ballots.

It is the second time that the administration ⁠has turned ‌to the Supreme Court as it defends Trump's directive against legal challenges by states and voting rights groups. On August 24 the court lifted an earlier injunction imposed by Talwani in June blocking Trump's order.

That decision, ⁠powered by the court's 6-3 conservative majority, faulted a coalition of mostly Democratic-governed states for suing too soon, but left the door open to another challenge. The court's three liberal justices dissented.

RULE WOULD TIGHTEN STANDARDS FOR MAIL BALLOT DELIVERY

Under the new USPS rule, states must provide lists of mail ballot recipients to the postal service and use agency-approved outbound and return ballot mail envelopes outfitted with unique barcodes. The postal service could then refuse to send out ballots that do not comply with the new standards or are associated with voters who do not appear on the lists.

Also Read: US judge blocks Trump's newest order limiting birthright citizenship

Trump, who signed his executive order targeting mail-in ballots in March, has for ‌years cast doubt on their security, although evidence of voter fraud is rare. Trump has made false claims of widespread fraud in U.S. elections including his 2020 loss to former Democratic President Joe Biden.

The administration in its written filing on Thursday urged the ⁠Supreme Court to allow it to implement an "important federal policy to protect the mails from being used to commit voter fraud."

A coalition of mostly Democratic-governed states and Washington, D.C., as well as a number of voting rights groups, challenged the new USPS rule.

Talwani issued a temporary order on August 27 blocking the rule for 14 days, finding that it likely violates the U.S. Constitution, under which the states administer elections, and would be impossible for the states to comply with given the rapidly approaching midterms.

The Justice Department asked the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to put the judge's order on hold, but did not wait for a decision before turning to the Supreme Court.

Talwani also held a hearing on Thursday to consider whether to issue a longer-term injunction.

Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
Add Now!

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)

Read More News on
Trump administrationUS Supreme CourtUSPS rulemidterm electionsvoter fraudJustice Department

Enter search text:

Continue reading with one of these options:
Limited Access
Free
Login to get access to some exclusive stories

& personalised newsletters
Login Now

Unlimited Access
Starting @ Rs120/month
Get access to exclusive stories, expert opinions &

in-depth stock reports
Subscribe Now

Unlock Access to All Exclusives with ETPrime FREE TRIAL

15 Days Free: Unlock All ETPrime Exclusives, Market Tools & ePapers

Trial offer expiring in00 : 05 : 00

I'd rather pay ₹2599 now

Uh-oh! This is an exclusive story available for selected readers only.

Worry not. You’re just a step away.

Prime Account Detected!

It seems like you're already an ETPrime member with

Log out of your current logged-in account and log in again using your ET Prime credentials to enjoy all member benefits.

Unlock ETPrime's Exclusive Stories Today!

Subscribe to gain powerful insights on business, stock market and industry trends.

Big Price Drop! Flat 40% Off

Student Only Offer

Already a Member? Sign In now

Already a Member? Sign In now
Already a Member? Sign In now

Offer Exclusively For You

Save up to Rs. 700/-

ON ET PRIME MEMBERSHIP

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get 1 Year Free

With 1 and 2-Year ET prime membership

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get 1 Year Free

With 1 and 2-Year ET prime membership

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get Flat 40% Off

Then ₹ 1749 for 1 year

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

ET Prime at ₹ 49 for 1 month

Then ₹ 1749 for 1 year

Avail Offer

Special Offer

Get flat 40% off on ETPrime

Avail Offer
Avail Offer

Claim NowAlready a Member? Sign In now

Need Assistance?

Connect with an ETPrime expert for personalized support and guidance

+91 9484700004

' + h3 + '

' + h4 + '

' + listing + '

What’s Included with

ETPrime Membership

1Exclusive Insights That Matter

Uncover the truth with our investigative stories

Make strategic moves using the real-world case studies

Read industry-specific stories to identify emerging trends

Spot opportunities with in-depth insights that matter

Trump temper on H-1B visas is forcing Indians to do these things to stay put in US

What Adani’s US indictment means for India Inc’s overseas fundraising
Why veterans like Reliance, L&T are on acquisition spree? Aswath Damodaran has an answer.

Will China’s dollar bond sale in Saudi Arabia trump the US in financial world?
Huawei launches its own OS to compete with Google and Apple. But can it win beyond China?

The problem with lab grown diamonds
Why a falling rupee is a better option for the economy

A list of top 20 momentum stocks that have delivered massive returns in one year