Skip to content
Mumbai · Saturday, 12 September 2026

National Revealed

The Truth can never be hidden

Business

UP govt using Goonda Act to harass: Allahabad HC

By Sohail Khan 12 September 2026, 3:59 pm

Benchmarks
Nifty23,398.10-79.71

Precious Metal
Gold (MCX) (Rs/10g.)152,655.00314.0

Enter search text:

Business News›News›India›UP govt seems determined to use Goonda Act as tool of harassment: Allahabad HC

    Read Today's Paper

    UP govt seems determined to use Goonda Act as tool of harassment: Allahabad HC
    Synopsis

    The Allahabad High Court has criticised the Uttar Pradesh government's use of the Goonda Act. The court observed the stringent law was used as a tool for harassment. It quashed an order declaring Zahid Ali a goonda and externing him. The court noted an acquitted case was wrongly used against Ali. This ruling highlights the need for caution when invoking the powerful Goonda Act.

    Allahabad HC flags harassment through misuse of UP’s Goonda Act.Agencies
    Allahabad HC criticises misuse of UP’s Goonda Act, quashing Zahid Ali’s externment order.

    Lucknow: The Allahabad High Court has come down heavily on the Uttar Pradesh government over alleged misuse of the Goonda Act in the state, observing that cases coming before it indicate that the state government appears determined to use the stringent law as a tool of harassment.



    A Lucknow bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi said the Goonda Act is a "very powerful" legislation and must be invoked with great caution, only in clear cases and for maintaining public order.



    The court made the observations while quashing the order of the Gonda district magistrate declaring a person named Zahid Ali a "goonda" and externing him from the district for six months.


    The court further noted that there was a gap of nearly six years between the 2020 criminal case and the 2026 order declaring Ali a goonda. It said no rational nexus could be established between the two.



    The high court also took exception to the police report mentioning the case in which Ali had already been acquitted, observing that it indicated that an incorrect picture of the petitioner had been placed before the DM.



    Read more: Preventive detention extraordinary power of state that must be used sparingly: SC



    The court said that mere involvement in a single criminal case of 2020 could not establish that Ali was a habitual offender or habitually committed or abetted offences.



    The bench also refused to accept the beat information report as a valid basis for invoking the Goonda Act.



    No criminal case had been registered on the basis of the information, nor had Ali been given an opportunity of hearing in relation to it. Relying on such material, the court said, would violate the principles of natural justice.



    The court also found that the commissioner had treated the acquitted case as a pending case against Ali, reflecting a failure to properly exercise discretion.



    Holding that the orders passed by both the DM and the commissioner were legally unsustainable, the high court quashed them and allowed Ali's petition.

    Add ET Logo as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
    Google Logo Add Now!


    (You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)


    (You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)


    Read More News on
    Goonda ActAllahabad High CourtUP governmentZahid AliGonda district magistrateJustice Subhash Vidyarthicriminal casespublic orderpreventive detentionUttar Pradesh government

    The The
    Enter search text:

    Stories you might be interested in

      Leave a Reply

      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *