Business

Husband held at mental health centre amid divorce

By Sohail Khan 5 October 2026, 1:10 pm

Benchmarks
Nifty22,463.0541.1

FEATURED FUNDS★★★★★

Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund Direct-Growth

5Y Return
19.6 %

Invest Now

Enter search text:

Business News›News›Trending›Wife sent husband to a mental health centre after a divorce fight, he spent 42 days there; Uttarakhand High Court orders him to be released

Read Today's Paper

Wife sent husband to a mental health centre after a divorce fight, he spent 42 days there; Uttarakhand High Court orders him to be released
Synopsis

A man was admitted to a Dehradun wellness facility by his wife amid their ongoing divorce dispute. After spending 42 days there, he approached the Uttarakhand High Court through a habeas corpus petition. The court found that the facility could not produce the medical certification required under the Mental Healthcare Act and ordered his immediate release.

Listen to this article in summarized format

Loading…
×
×

Unlock AI Briefing and Premium Content

New Year Offer 24 Hours Left
Already a member? Sign In

What's Included

Exclusive Stories
Daily ePaper Access
Smart Market Tools
Curated Investment Ideas
Ad-lite Experience
Subscription

Wife admitted husband to a mental health centre after divorce dispute, he spent 42 days there before Uttarakhand High Court ordered him to be released.

A man moved the Uttarakhand High Court with a habeas corpus petition, saying he was being held at a Dehradun facility against his wishes. He told the court he had been there for 42 days and wanted to go home. The petition named the facility, Ashirwad Wellness Samiti, as a respondent along with the state.

Why Was He Admitted To The Mental Health Facility

The man and his wife are currently going through a divorce. According to the case, it was his wife who had him admitted to the facility. His lawyer argued this was done without his consent and without following the process the law requires before someone can be kept at such a centre against their will.

What Did The Facility's Lawyer Argue

Appearing for the facility, the lawyer told the court the man was free to leave whenever he wanted. The facility also claimed it was following the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017. To support the admission, the lawyer pointed to a medical examination carried out on the day the man arrived, along with a blood test done the same day, which the facility said led to the conclusion that admission was necessary.

What Does The Law Actually Require

The court turned to Section 89 of the Mental Healthcare Act, which allows what is called a supported admission, for up to 30 days, when a person cannot make treatment decisions on their own. But the provision sets a high bar. It requires the person to be examined independently by a psychiatrist and, separately, by another mental health professional or medical practitioner. Both must independently conclude that the person poses a risk of harm to himself or to others, or is unable to care for himself.

Did The Facility Meet This Requirement

When the bench asked whether any such joint certification existed for the man, the facility's lawyer admitted it did not. The admission had been based on a single doctor's examination and a blood test, not the two-professional certification the law demands. A medical report on record also noted that the man had a history of alcohol and ganja use, but the judges made it clear that addiction by itself does not amount to mental illness under the Act.

What Did The District Magistrate's Report Show

The court had earlier directed the Dehradun district magistrate to look into how the facility was being run and to submit a report. The magistrate joined the hearing over video conferencing but told the judges he had not had time to go through the report prepared by his own office. Even so, it emerged during the hearing that the facility's registration had lapsed in August 2025 and was never renewed, and that it had recently shifted its location while continuing to operate with 28 other people housed there.

Also read: Bank restricted access to matured fixed deposits worth Rs 13.8 lakh, allowed customer to withdraw only Rs 50,000, ordered to pay Rs 14.15 lakh

What Did The Petitioner Tell The Court

The judges spoke with the man directly during the hearing. He repeated that he wanted to return home and confirmed the dispute with his wife was still unresolved. His counsel maintained throughout that there was no valid order or certificate that could justify keeping him at the facility for over a month.

What Did The Court Decide

The bench of Justice Ravindra Maithani and Justice Siddhartha Sah held that, without the certification required under Section 89, there was no basis to conclude the man was suffering from mental illness as defined under the law. With no valid paperwork backing the detention and the man himself asking to leave, the court said it had no option but to order his release. The petition was disposed of, and the man was allowed to go wherever he wished.

Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
Add Now!

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)

Read More News on
mental health treatment without consentperson kept in mental health facility against wisheswife admit husband to mental health centreforced mental health admissionman held for 42 days at mental health centrewife admits husband to mental health facility during divorce disputwife husband divorce dispute

Enter search text:

Continue reading with one of these options:
Limited Access
Free
Login to get access to some exclusive stories

& personalised newsletters
Login Now

Unlimited Access
Starting @ Rs120/month
Get access to exclusive stories, expert opinions &

in-depth stock reports
Subscribe Now

Unlock Access to All Exclusives with ETPrime FREE TRIAL

15 Days Free: Unlock All ETPrime Exclusives, Market Tools & ePapers

Trial offer expiring in00 : 05 : 00

I'd rather pay ₹2599 now

Uh-oh! This is an exclusive story available for selected readers only.

Worry not. You’re just a step away.

Prime Account Detected!

It seems like you're already an ETPrime member with

Log out of your current logged-in account and log in again using your ET Prime credentials to enjoy all member benefits.

Unlock ETPrime's Exclusive Stories Today!

Subscribe to gain powerful insights on business, stock market and industry trends.

Big Price Drop! Flat 40% Off

Student Only Offer

Already a Member? Sign In now

Already a Member? Sign In now
Already a Member? Sign In now

Offer Exclusively For You

Save up to Rs. 700/-

ON ET PRIME MEMBERSHIP

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get 1 Year Free

With 1 and 2-Year ET prime membership

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get 1 Year Free

With 1 and 2-Year ET prime membership

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get Flat 40% Off

Then ₹ 1749 for 1 year

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

ET Prime at ₹ 49 for 1 month

Then ₹ 1749 for 1 year

Avail Offer

Special Offer

Get flat 40% off on ETPrime

Avail Offer
Avail Offer

Claim NowAlready a Member? Sign In now

Need Assistance?

Connect with an ETPrime expert for personalized support and guidance

+91 9484700004

' + h3 + '

' + h4 + '

' + listing + '

What’s Included with

ETPrime Membership

1Exclusive Insights That Matter

Uncover the truth with our investigative stories

Make strategic moves using the real-world case studies

Read industry-specific stories to identify emerging trends

Spot opportunities with in-depth insights that matter

Trump temper on H-1B visas is forcing Indians to do these things to stay put in US

What Adani’s US indictment means for India Inc’s overseas fundraising
Why veterans like Reliance, L&T are on acquisition spree? Aswath Damodaran has an answer.

Will China’s dollar bond sale in Saudi Arabia trump the US in financial world?
Huawei launches its own OS to compete with Google and Apple. But can it win beyond China?

The problem with lab grown diamonds
Why a falling rupee is a better option for the economy

A list of top 20 momentum stocks that have delivered massive returns in one year