Skip to content
Mumbai · Monday, 5 October 2026

National Revealed

The Truth can never be hidden

Business

Ex-CJI & judges hit out at Bhuyan’s remarks

By Sohail Khan 5 October 2026, 5:28 pm

Benchmarks
Nifty22,555.75133.8

FEATURED FUNDS★★★★★

Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund Direct-Growth

5Y Return
19.6 %

Invest Now

Enter search text:

Business News›News›India›Ex-CJI B R Gavai, former judges criticise SC judge Ujjal Bhuyan's remarks on disenfranchisement

    Read Today's Paper

    Ex-CJI B R Gavai, former judges criticise SC judge Ujjal Bhuyan's remarks on disenfranchisement
    Synopsis

    Retired judges have expressed their disapproval of Justice Ujjal Bhuyan's comments regarding disenfranchisement during recent remarks. They emphasized that the issue he spoke about is currently sub judice before the Supreme Court. Former Chief Justice B R Gavai stated that judicial propriety prohibits such comments from a sitting judge. Additionally, the judges questioned whether the electoral roll exercise actually constitutes disenfranchisement.

    Justice Ujjal BhuyanPTI
    Justice Ujjal Bhuyan highlighted the significance of voting rights during a recent address at NALSAR University

    New Delhi: Former Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and other retired judges on Monday criticised the much-publicised statement of Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan on disenfranchisement, saying that he should not have made these remarks on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls as the issue is sub judice before the apex court.



    Sitting judge Justice Bhuyan, while delivering the valedictory address at the 19th Justice Bodh Raj Sawhney Memorial Moot Court Competition at NALSAR University of Law on Sunday, said any process that "disenfranchises" millions of Indian citizens was "intrinsically arbitrary" and a "negation" of the constitutional order.



    He also said the Constitution does not provide for two classes of citizens, one with voting rights and the other without voting rights, and no amount of "whataboutery" could justify such a process.



    (You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)


    (You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)


    Read More News on
    Justice Ujjal BhuyanSupreme Court of IndiaB R Gavaivoting rightsdisenfranchisementelectoral rollsNALSAR University of LawJudicial propriety

    The The
    Enter search text:

    Stories you might be interested in

      Leave a Reply

      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *