‘Unemployment state’s prime concern’: Bombay HC asks Maharashtra to end long-term contractual hiring

The Bombay High Court on Friday asked the Maharashtra government to ensure ‘ad-hocism in public employment is consigned to history’ and issue a ‘directive to all the municipal corporations to do away with long-term contractual appointments and grant regularisation as per past Supreme Court judgements’.
In doing so, the Court ordered the Vasai Virar Municipal Corporation (VVMC) to absorb over 450 medical officers and paramedical staff working on a contractual basis for years and regularise them.
A division bench of Justices Girish S Kulkarni and Aarti A Sathe on Friday quashed January 2026 communications by the Urban Development Department and VVMC requiring contractual staff to take a fresh written examination and directed the civic body to grant regularisation within two weeks.
Story continues below.
Subscribe to see fewer ads.
Advocates Abhijeet Desai and Mohini Rephade for Maharashtra-domiciled petitioners including MBBS/BAMS doctors, specialists, nurses, and technicians, contended that despite serving 8–11 years continuous service on contract basis after fulfilling eligibility criteria for a selection process, including interviews and reservation, they were required to sign periodic renewal contracts.
The bench observed that ‘the creation of posts and filling up of vacancies in the manner contemplated by the applicable rules ought to be the rule, while contractual appointments for very short durations needs to be an exception’.
However, it added, “We find that what has infected the system is the cultivation of such ad-hocism, rather than the creation and maintenance of a robust and permanent cadre of employees appointed as soon as vacancies arise.”
The bench said such ad-hocism was ‘counterproductive to the smooth discharge of the vital functions in achieving the welfare of the public at large’ and created ‘tremendous uncertainty for such contractual employees’.
Story continues below this ad
“We also cannot be oblivious to the fact that, in a large country like ours, unemployment is one of the prime concerns of the State. No fault can be found with citizens grabbing every possible opportunity of public employment, including contractual, temporary and all kinds of public employment,” Justice Kulkarni, for the bench, observed.
The bench flagged ‘red-tape or bureaucratic lethargy’ and questioned why sanctioned posts for regular appointments were not created when a qualified workforce was available.
The HC observed the employees ought not to be made to ‘knock doors of the court’ and a ‘robust and comprehensive policy, as a one-time measure’ by government was required for their regularisation.




Leave a Reply