Skip to content
Mumbai · Sunday, 20 September 2026

National Revealed

The Truth can never be hidden

City

Mumbai Court Rejects Bail Plea Of Man Accused Of Getting Govt Insurance Job Through Dummy Candidate

By Sohail Khan 20 September 2026, 8:35 am

A Mumbai sessions court has rejected anticipatory bail for Patna resident Chandan Kumar, accused of fraudulently securing a job as an administrative officer at a central government-owned insurance firm. The prosecution alleged he used a dummy candidate for recruitment exams and interviews and received ₹20.16 lakh in salary over two years.

Mumbai Court Rejects Bail Plea Of Man Accused Of Getting Govt Insurance Job Through Dummy Candidate

Mumbai Court Rejects Bail Plea Of Man Accused Of Getting Govt Insurance Job Through Dummy Candidate | Representational Image

Mumbai: A sessions court has denied anticipatory bail to a 32-year-old Patna resident accused of fraudulently obtaining a job at a central government-owned insurance firm and drawing `20.16 lakh in salary over roughly two years.

Fraud allegations in recruitment

According to the prosecution, accused Chandan Kumar allegedly made a dummy candidate appear for the examination and interview conducted for the post of administrative officer. He was appointed on April 1, 2024.

On October 6, 2025, the insurer received an e-mail alleging that Kumar, along with two other employees, had fraudulently secured appointments.

`;

Subsequently, the firm initiated an investigation and claimed to have found that Kumar’s biometrics did not match the impressions taken during the examination. A show-cause notice was issued to him and his services were terminated on January 6 this year.

Claims over other candidates

The public prosecutor also claimed that Kumar’s dummy candidate had appeared for the other two accused in the same recruitment process. However, details regarding the duo were not clear.

Kumar’s lawyer argued that the company had not given him an opportunity to defend himself.

Also Watch:

Court rejects bail plea

Rejecting his anticipatory bail plea, the court observed, “The applicant’s biometric impressions are stated to be matching with those recorded during the subsequent training process. However, this circumstance by itself does not explain the alleged mismatch concerning the impressions and photographs pertaining to the examination and interview.”

To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/

google-news-icon

Add As a

Trusted Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *