The Bombay High Court criticised Pune’s 10-day alcohol ban during Ganeshotsav, questioning why only Pune was targeted. After the court’s intervention, authorities restricted the prohibition to September 14 and September 25. The bench said blanket restrictions could stigmatise residents and cannot assume every alcohol consumer creates law and order issues.

10-Day Alcohol Ban During Ganesh Festival In Pune Withdrawn After Bombay HC Rebuke | AI

Mumbai, Sep 11: The Bombay High Court on Friday slammed the Pune administration for banning alcohol during the 10-day Ganesh festival, asking why the district was singled out while other regions including Mumbai were spared, forcing the authorities to limit prohibition to only two days.

A bench of Chief Justice M C Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna said earlier in the day that the court would intervene if the prohibition order was not withdrawn, as such arbitrary crackdown stigmatised Pune and its residents.

Additional government pleader Kedar Dighe informed the court subsequently that the restriction on alcohol sale and consumption would now be in force only till 4 pm on September 14, the first day of the festival, and throughout the last day on September 25 which is already a dry day.

The court accepted the statement and said the Collector shall issue a fresh order to this effect.

`;

Associations of hotel owners and wine shop owners had moved the High Court challenging the Pune Collector's order prohibiting sale of alcohol for 10 days during the Ganesh festival.

When the petition came up for hearing in the morning, the HC asked why prohibition was imposed only in Pune, which is the most "civilised and educated city".

"What is the rationale behind choosing only Pune? We deprecate such practice. This is a stigma on Pune residents. What are you trying to portray that only people in Pune behave badly after drinking? One district you are choosing across the state," the court remarked.

It asked the government lawyer to inform if the order would be withdrawn.

The bench further said that while it understands that the authorities need to maintain law and order and avoid nuisance, a blanket order prohibiting licence holders from carrying on their trade for 10 days cannot be passed.

With such prohibition, habitual drinkers would end up with medical issues, the judges said jokingly.

"They will flood hospitals if they don't get to drink for 10 days," Chief Justice Tripathi quipped, adding that a blanket prohibition would cause a revenue loss to the state excise department.

It can not be said that every person who consumes alcohol would cause nuisance or a law and order issue, the bench said.

To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/

(Except for the headline, this article has not been edited by 's editorial team and auto-generated from an agency feed.)

Add As a

Trusted Source