Benchmarks
Nifty24,229.15-2.7

FEATURED FUNDS★★★★★

Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund Direct-Growth

5Y Return
24.02 %

Invest Now

Enter search text:

Business News›News›India›'Stillborn law': Supreme Court finds fault with UP Gangsters Act, says prone to misuse

Read Today's Paper

'Stillborn law': Supreme Court finds fault with UP Gangsters Act, says prone to misuse

Synopsis

The Supreme Court has declared the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters Act stillborn. This 1986 law is prone to misuse against unsuspecting citizens. The court noted the act allows punishment without a defined legal offense. It stated the law could perpetuate violence while aiming to prevent it. The judgment quashed a case against two advocates under this act.

PTI

New Delhi, Observing that the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act is prone to misuse, the Supreme Court has held that the 1986 law is "stillborn" as a person cannot be punished merely based on being labelled a "gangster".



A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K Vinod Chandran said the law, which was enacted to stop violence and organised criminal activity, could instead be used against unsuspecting citizens.



Also read: India's first large-scale biopolymer plant in UP set for October launch

The Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act is a special state law enacted to target, control and punish organised crime syndicates, criminal gangs and habitual anti-social elements.



A "stillborn" law is a legal term used to describe a statute as invalid, void or legally dead from its inception because it fails to define a valid legal offence.




The top court said the law was capable of "perpetuating" violence against citizens "on the pretext of adjuring violence".

"After defining gang, which includes commission of the offences listed under sub-clauses (i) to (xxv), and defining gangster as a member or leader or organiser of a gang, the punishment is prescribed for a gangster without an offence being created by statute, which makes the penal act stillborn," the bench said.

Quoting English author George Orwell, the top court said, "Those who abjure violence can do so only because others are committing violence on their behalf."



The apex court said the menace of criminal gangs is to be curbed, but the end does not justify the means, especially in enacting a penal law that interferes with the liberty of citizens.



"The provisions of the Act could lead to a detention of the accused without trial for long, which is akin to a statute enjoining preventive detention. Though preventive detention has been held to be permissible even in the teeth of Article 21, the same is hedged with safeguards, which are held to be sacrosanct and even a minor procedural violation would entail release of the detenu…



"However compelling and threatening the social menace, any penal enactment to curb that, it cannot lead to arbitrary and capricious actions against the one alleged with the commission of an offence," the bench said.



The apex court passed the judgement while quashing a criminal case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, against two advocates. PTI

Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
Add Now!

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)


Read More News on
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters ActSupreme Courtmisuse of lawcriminal justiceArticle 21Supreme Court of IndiaUP newsUP Gangsters Act

Enter search text:

Stories you might be interested in