Dilip Ghumare’s “intemperate outburst against the court’s administration in full public view constituted a deliberate and unwarranted assault upon the dignity and authority of this court”, the court said

Published on: Sep 4, 2026, 07:57:10 IST

Prefer HTon Google

Share via
Copy link

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday issued a contempt notice to the Secretary and Senior Legal Advisor of the department of law and judiciary, Dilip Ghumare, for an allegedly “aggressive and high-pitched” outburst against the court administration during the hearing of a public interest litigation (PIL).

Ghumare’s “unwarranted outburst and aggressive demeanour deliberately displayed before an open court in full public view while attempting to justify his stand not only scandalised the court but undermined and attempted to lower its authority, constituting contempt under the Constitution of India and the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971”, a division bench of justices AS Gadkari and Kamal Khata observed.

Ghumare refused to comment on the development.

The alleged comments were made while the court was hearing an interim application in connection with a 2013 PIL. During the hearing, the court referred to its order dated August 24 and an affidavit filed by Ghumare dated August 27, which claimed that 179 new posts had been created for fast track courts.

The court questioned the additional government pleader (AGP) PP Kakade about the averment. As he was unable to provide a clear and unequivocal response, the court asked Ghumare to identify the relevant averments and questioned who had filed the affidavit.

Rather than respond to the court’s query, Ghumare responded in “an aggressive, high-pitched tone inter alia blaming the high court administration”. He also claimed before a packed courtroom that “the high court administration was responsible for not filling up the 179 posts”.

The bench said that Ghumare’s “intemperate outburst against the court’s administration in full public view constituted a deliberate and unwarranted assault upon the dignity and authority of this court”; such conduct was manifestly unbecoming of any judicial officer, simply outrageous, and fell far below the standard expected by the court, the judges said.

The court further said that it is a settled practice that all litigants are expected to maintain decorum and respect the sanctity of proceedings. This expectation becomes imperative when the person in question is himself a judicial officer, the court noted.

While Ghumare apologised before the court for his behaviour, the bench observed that his conduct was “wholly unpardonable and cannot be countenanced”. Ghumare could not certainly forget that he was a judicial officer and his position did not confer on him the privilege to treat the court with utter disrespect, the bench said.

“To permit this would convey to the public at large a deeply troubling message: that one can commit an otherwise inexcusable act with impunity in open court and then sheepishly, in a theatrical manner, not meaning a word of it, offer an apology to absolve himself of an act which ex facie is contemptuous,” the court said.

Accordingly, the bench directed the registrar to issue a notice to Ghumare, asking why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him, and posted the matter for further hearing on September 11.

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!



Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.

See Less