Wife no need to do household chores: Karnataka HC

By Sohail Khan 27 August 2026, 4:11 pm

Benchmarks
Nifty24,090.85-116.91

Precious Metal
Gold (MCX) (Rs/10g.)158,309.00-1354.0

Enter search text:

Business News›News›Trending›Wife doesn't have to obey husband at home: 'No need to do household chores or care for in-laws', says Karnataka HC

Read Today's Paper

Wife doesn't have to obey husband at home: 'No need to do household chores or care for in-laws', says Karnataka HC
Synopsis

The Karnataka High Court has said a husband cannot force his wife to perform household chores, care for his parents or seek permission to visit her own parents. The court stressed equality within marriage, said caring for in-laws must remain voluntary and upheld Rs 9,000 monthly maintenance for the wife and daughter.

Wife doesn't have to obey husband at home: 'No need to do houshold chores or care for in-laws', says Karnataka HC.

A wife does not have to obey her husband's demands to perform household chores or care for his parents, the Karnataka High Court has said, stressing that marriage does not give a husband the right to control his wife's choices or freedom.

The court said household responsibilities should remain shared between men and women, while caring for parents remains the responsibility of their own son or daughter. A daughter-in-law or son-in-law may care for in-laws voluntarily, but neither can face force to do so, the court observed.

Justice Chillakur Sumalatha made the observations in an order passed on August 3 while dismissing a petition filed by a Nelamangala resident. The man had challenged a family court order from Tumakuru that directed him to pay Rs 5,000 a month to his wife and Rs 4,000 to his minor daughter as maintenance.

Husband said wife stopped doing household work

The petitioner told the high court that he worked as a coolie and could not afford the maintenance amount because he also had to care for his aged parents.

He also alleged that his wife changed her behaviour towards his parents around six months after their marriage. According to him, she stopped doing household work and stopped caring for her father and mother-in-law.

The husband further complained that his wife repeatedly went to her parents' home without taking permission from him or his parents.

The high court rejected the argument that these expectations could form the basis of his case.

The court noted that the husband's claims could make anyone with "a minimum amount of common sense" feel that he had employed his wife to perform household chores and care for his parents, .

Court rejects idea of controlling wife

Justice Sumalatha also took issue with the husband's complaint that his wife visited her parents without his or his parents' permission.

The court said the assertion revealed the petitioner's mindset and his desire to control and dictate his wife's behaviour and choices.

The judge questioned why an Indian woman should need permission from members of her matrimonial home simply to visit her parents whenever she wishes or feels the need to do so, according to .

The court also emphasised that marriage does not make one partner subordinate to the other.

"Marriage is not a licence to control, dominate or undermine the individuality, freedom and will of the other," the judge observed, as quoted by .

Caring for in-laws cannot be forced

The court said household activities should receive equal participation from both men and women.

If elderly parents require care, their primary responsibility rests with their son or daughter, depending on the circumstances. The court said that responsibility does not automatically shift to a daughter-in-law or son-in-law.

Caring for in-laws can remain an act of affection or personal choice, but the court said families cannot force a son-in-law or daughter-in-law to perform it.

The judge also rejected the idea that a wife's commitment to her family should depend on obedience or submission.

"A wife's dedication to family can never be measured by obedience and submission," the court said, according to .

Marriage does not take away a woman's autonomy

The court described marriage as a relationship built on love, trust, respect, mutual support and understanding rather than control.

It said women have the right to make decisions about their careers, finances and other aspects of their lives. A husband, therefore, cannot compel his wife to live according to his wishes or expectations.

The court also said marriage is not a relationship between unequals and warned that attempts to restrict a woman's liberty simply because of her gender go against equality, human dignity and social justice.

Court upholds Rs 9,000 maintenance

On the maintenance amount, the petitioner argued that the family court had awarded an excessive sum considering his income and responsibility towards his elderly parents.

The high court did not find grounds to reduce the amount.

Justice Sumalatha noted that the combined maintenance of Rs 9,000 for the wife and minor daughter worked out to around Rs 300 per day and found no reason to modify the family court's order.

The high court therefore dismissed the petition and left the maintenance order unchanged.

(With inputs)

Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source
Add Now!

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)

(You can now subscribe to our WhatsApp channel)

Read More News on
Karnataka High Courtwife rightswife household choreshusband wife relationshipwomen's autonomyhusbands controlling wifemarriage rights husband wifehusband wifewife autonomy marriage

Enter search text:

Continue reading with one of these options:
Limited Access
Free
Login to get access to some exclusive stories

& personalised newsletters
Login Now

Unlimited Access
Starting @ Rs120/month
Get access to exclusive stories, expert opinions &

in-depth stock reports
Subscribe Now

Unlock Access to All Exclusives with ETPrime FREE TRIAL

15 Days Free: Unlock All ETPrime Exclusives, Market Tools & ePapers

Trial offer expiring in00 : 05 : 00

I'd rather pay ₹2599 now

Uh-oh! This is an exclusive story available for selected readers only.

Worry not. You’re just a step away.

Prime Account Detected!

It seems like you're already an ETPrime member with

Log out of your current logged-in account and log in again using your ET Prime credentials to enjoy all member benefits.

Unlock ETPrime's Exclusive Stories Today!

Subscribe to gain powerful insights on business, stock market and industry trends.

Big Price Drop! Flat 40% Off

Student Only Offer

Already a Member? Sign In now

Already a Member? Sign In now
Already a Member? Sign In now

Offer Exclusively For You

Save up to Rs. 700/-

ON ET PRIME MEMBERSHIP

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get 1 Year Free

With 1 and 2-Year ET prime membership

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get 1 Year Free

With 1 and 2-Year ET prime membership

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

Get Flat 40% Off

Then ₹ 1749 for 1 year

Avail Offer

Offer Exclusively For You

ET Prime at ₹ 49 for 1 month

Then ₹ 1749 for 1 year

Avail Offer

Special Offer

Get flat 40% off on ETPrime

Avail Offer
Avail Offer

Claim NowAlready a Member? Sign In now

Need Assistance?

Connect with an ETPrime expert for personalized support and guidance

+91 9484700004

' + h3 + '

' + h4 + '

' + listing + '

What’s Included with

ETPrime Membership

1Exclusive Insights That Matter

Uncover the truth with our investigative stories

Make strategic moves using the real-world case studies

Read industry-specific stories to identify emerging trends

Spot opportunities with in-depth insights that matter

Trump temper on H-1B visas is forcing Indians to do these things to stay put in US

What Adani’s US indictment means for India Inc’s overseas fundraising
Why veterans like Reliance, L&T are on acquisition spree? Aswath Damodaran has an answer.

Will China’s dollar bond sale in Saudi Arabia trump the US in financial world?
Huawei launches its own OS to compete with Google and Apple. But can it win beyond China?

The problem with lab grown diamonds
Why a falling rupee is a better option for the economy

A list of top 20 momentum stocks that have delivered massive returns in one year