A 24-year-old former student of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) on Thursday moved the Bombay High Court (HC), seeking anticipatory bail. In his plea, the student has claimed that there is “absolutely no evidence” that he raised pro-Umar Khalid, Shajeel Imam slogans during the 2025 campus gathering on the death anniversary of former Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba.

In his plea, the ex-student, booked for allegedly holding the event at the TISS campus without permission, said the case could “scar him for life” and “destroy his career and hope to earn a livelihood”. He rejected the allegations, saying they were “false” and made “purely on the basis” that the students did not seek permission to hold the event, and were influenced by “polarising posts” on social media.

Asserting his “constitutional right to read books of any ideology”, the former student contends in his pre-arrest bail application that possessing and downloading any literature of any ideology neither makes him an author of it nor establishes his affiliation with any organisation.

The matter will be heard by a single-judge bench of Justice Prafulla S Khubalkar on Friday, August 14.

Earlier on August 8, a Sessions Court refused him anticipatory bail and to another 30-year-old former student. The other former student was arrested by police earlier this week.

The TISS case

In October 2025, the Trombay Police registered an FIR against nine individuals on a complaint lodged by the TISS associate dean. It was subsequently transferred to the Mumbai Police Crime Branch for further investigation.

The complaint stated that around 10-12 students assembled at the Deonar campus between 7.30 pm and 8.30 pm on October 12, 2025, without permission to pay homage to GN Saibaba, who was convicted and later acquitted in a Maoists link case.

Story continues below this ad

GN Saibaba, who had 90 per cent disability due to polio, was wheelchair-bound and spent nearly a decade in prison. He died seven months after his release.

Sessions Judge VB Bohra observed during the August 8 hearing that while “paying homage to Saibaba cannot be termed as illegal,” the allegations that the two students had raised slogans supporting Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, who are facing trial under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), deserved rejection of their anticipatory bail plea.

The applicant, through advocate Vijay Hiremath, claimed that a similar October 2024 TISS campus event commemorated Saibaba’s contributions. Hence, his client and others did not seek permission for the rather “small, peaceful” event in 2025, believing the institute would not object.