Traders staged a sit-in at the Municipal Corporation office, demanding withdrawal of the commercial licence fee. Organised by the Bhopal Chamber of Commerce and Industries, the delegation met Mayor Malti Rai and Chairman Kishan Suryavanshi and submitted a memorandum ahead of the council meeting, claiming Bhopal is the only MP city imposing the fee.

Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh): Bhopal Traders protested against the municipal corporation’s drive to seal commercial stores operating in residential areas. Demanding the immediate withdrawal of tax, they visited the Municipal Corporation office at the ISBT and held a sit-in protest.

The protest was organised under the banner of the Bhopal Chamber of Commerce and Industries.

According to the trader, Bhopal is the only city in Madhya Pradesh where a commercial licence fee is being levied, calling the practice unfair and a financial burden on the city’s business community.

During the protest, they met with Mayor Malti Rai and Municipal Corporation Chairman Kishan Suryavanshi.

`;

Traders submitted the memorandum to Mayor Malti Rai ahead of council meeting session begins

Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh: Traders protested against the municipal corporation’s sealing drive on commercial establishments in residential areas. They demanded an end to the action, implementation of the Bhopal Master Plan and a mixed land-use policy pic.twitter.com/VwyAnyeIdB

— IANS (@ians_india) August 19, 2026

They pointed out that while traders have been paying this tax for years, it is not being levied anywhere else in the state.

During the meeting, business representatives expressed deep concern that the commercial license fee is not enforced in other cities of Madhya Pradesh. Instead, this additional charge is being imposed solely on traders in Bhopal.

The traders raised a pertinent question: Why are Bhopal's traders being subjected to this discriminatory and unfair treatment? Bhopal is the state capital, and its business community contributes significantly to the city's economy, employment, and revenue.

Under these circumstances, imposing an additional financial burden on traders—rather than providing them relief—is unjustifiable from any perspective.

Business organizations stated that if commercial activities can operate in other cities without such a fee, the justification for imposing this separate financial burden on Bhopal's traders must be clearly explained.

Add As a

Trusted Source